Just a quick offering in the lead-up to our Quadrennial Extravaganza Day Ritual.

The attached suggest the inextricable connections between the overlapping, ongoing psyops relating to election integrity, Covid and Gaza issues.  We invite those with the bandwidth to examine them on your own and reach your own conclusions.

1) -The first link is a short scanned PDF excerpt from the Malones' new book PsyWar. Here’s an even briefer summary:

On Nov. 6, 2023 the Congressional House Interim Report was published. It told how the Dept. of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security agency (CISA) and the Global Engagement Center (GEC, within the State Department), coordinated with Stanford University’s ominously named Internet Observatory (SIO); The University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public (CIP); a  company named Graphika; and the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab) [a known CIA front], all joined forces to create something called the Election Integrity Project (EIP). 

It was a blatant project of government-sponsored censorship and a psychological influence operation (psyop) aimed at the US electorate in the run-up to the 2020 election.  Later it morphed into a Covid cognitive engineering project, and still later into a psyop focused on combating accurate news reports on the Zionist Gaza Genocide. Same tune, different lyrics.

The documentable tracks were later attempted to be scrubbed and were only obtained under threat of contempt of Congress!

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/lqbdy46l80z4id8320nkr/ADbu1IhTOUXD-SSbe8Zl91w?rlkey=op4lm0hgc8gmufjhmx1odjn68&dl=0

2) - The second is the Staff Report itself:

THE WEAPONIZATION OF “DISINFORMATION” PSEUDO-EXPERTS ANDBUREAUCRATS: HOW THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PARTNERED WITH UNIVERSITIES TO CENSOR AMERICANS’ POLITICAL SPEECH Interim Staff Report of the Committee on the Judiciary and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal GovernmentU.S. House of Representative

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/EIP_Jira_Ticket_Staff_Report_11-6-23_Clean.pdf

3) – The third exhibit is a recent House Oversight Committee Report

on the government’s deployment of weapons of mass deception [lies] against We, The People, titled, “We Can Do This: An Assessment of the Department of Health and Human Services’ Covid-19 Public Campaign.

This is thanks to Jeff Childers Coffee and Substack

Date: On Monday, October 28th, 2024 at 6:41 PM
Subject: From Jeff Childers Coffee and substack

This week, the House Oversight Committee released its long-awaited report on the government’s misuse of psychological manipulation during the pandemic. It’s ugly. The House report was titled, “We Can Do This: An Assessment of the Department of Health and Human Services’ Covid-19 Public Campaign.

The report weighs in at a very-readable 70 pages. I recommend the whole thing. If you’re time-limited, skim the table of contents on the third page and just read the sections of most interest. For a quick overview of the whole thing, read this Twitter thread summarizing the report written by Stanford Professor and real public health expert Dr. Jay Bhattacharya

In fall 2020, the bureaucratic behemoth that is HHS was well along in swinging its monstrous apparatus of government over the heads of every citizen in the country. Instead of doing its own work, the government’s vast army of overpaid health bureaucrats outsourced critical public health communications to a “full-service behavior-change research” firm.

Not a science firm. Not a health firm. A “behavior-change research” firm. The firm’s name, which should become as much a hissing and a byword as the names “Mengele” or “Benedict Arnold,” is the Fors Marsh Group. (We will figure out the names of the involved individuals at FMG. I bet there is a lot more to this story.)

As the report’s introduction explains, for its “behavior change” services, HHS ultimately paid FMG over nine hundred million dollars. Stop and think about that for a second. The U.S. government paid nearly a billion dollars to one company to manipulate citizens into becoming more compliant to the government.

But … but … it was all meant for good, right? I mean, sure, we can quibble about the ethics of psychological manipulation and “nudging” and stuff, but those decisions were made during a pandemic, amidst a public health emergency, when lives were at stake. But the important thing is their hearts were in the right place. Right?

Maybe not. Maybe it was much simpler than it looks. What advanced techniques did FMG use to make the American public more compliant? What cutting-edge science did FORS bring to the HHS table, to earn their billion-dollar fee? Was it a blend of innovative AI and pioneering psychology?

Nope. They just lied. They lied, and they exaggerated stuff, to terrify people. Their lies were so bloody awful and so preposterous that nobody would have ever listened to them — except that they put the full weight and credit of the United States government behind their lies and fearmongering to make the whole grotesque scheme work. In doing so, they consumed every drop of historic trust earned by previous generations of hard-working public servants.

But … did they really lie? Yes. They lied. They lied like rugs, or dogs, or Joe Biden reminiscing about his Uncle Bosey. They lied tons of times. Lies like promising that vaccination would stop transmission of the virus dead in its tracks. That particular lie came from the CDC itself (i.e., the pits of hell) and sailed straight into the FMG’s advertising scripts:

FMG’s plan wasn’t innovative. It wasn’t cutting edge. A child could have done it. They’re morons. They just lied, and they leaned on Americans’ trust in government to sell their simplistic lies. And the bureaucrats running the health agencies and the country’s liberal health professionals all compliantly went right along with it all, facilitating the lies at every step.

Lies are unethical and Liars are bad people. Even, or especially, public health liars. FMG’s whole stupid program was unethical to the core.

It was also overhyped nonsense. For example, FMG’s initial proposal to HHS was founded on a single “theory” they called the “Health Belief Model.” Here’s how they dressed their so-called Health Belief Model up in fancy, academic-sounding language:

That’s not innovative, creative, cutting-edge, or even smart. All that Model says is, if you scare people by saying they’ll die, and don’t give them time to think, they’re likely to do whatever you say, especially if they already trust the person telling them what to do:

Of course, afterwards, once they figure out they’ve been had, people won’t trust the “influencers, celebrities, and sports figures” anymore, but who cares? FMG will already be rich by then.

In other words, the plan was to coerce or bribe top government officials, doctors, pastors, priests, social media stars, bloggers, vloggers, Hollywood celebrities, singers, football players, and tennis stars into lying for them. The House report included the scripts FMG prepared for actors who pretended to be covid victims.

It was all completely fake and completely outrageous.

Worse, it’s not just the billion dollars FMG got. The real cost includes Americans’ lost trust in government. And the lost trust in public health. The lost trust in vaccines (well, that one might actually be a positive). The lost trust in experts. The spiked anxiety rates from the fear campaigns. The broken brains of germaphobes and medical fetishists. The cost to the children in lost educational attainment, depression, and who knows what kinds of future psychosis.

(We could continue, adding vaccine injuries, jobs lost to mandates, closed businesses, destroyed economies, inflation, and so on.)

But the important thing is FMG’s owners got paid. And they were paid well. Very well. They are now set to retire on generational wealth earned from our tax dollars, all wielded as psychological weapons against us.

This House report was a great start toward accountability. Having documents like this is important, because they can be cited as official findings. For example, a court is much more likely to seriously consider something from a House Oversight Report than something some lawyer says. We’re getting there.

Thanks for reading Planetarian Perspectives from EON3! Subscribe for free to receive new posts, or for any amount to help support our work.